Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(s(x), x, x)
f(x, y, s(z)) → s(f(0, 1, z))
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(s(x), x, x)
f(x, y, s(z)) → s(f(0, 1, z))
Q is empty.
The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [15] we can switch to innermost.
↳ QTRS
↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(s(x), x, x)
f(x, y, s(z)) → s(f(0, 1, z))
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(0, 1, x0)
f(x0, x1, s(x2))
Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, y, s(z)) → F(0, 1, z)
F(0, 1, x) → F(s(x), x, x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(s(x), x, x)
f(x, y, s(z)) → s(f(0, 1, z))
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(0, 1, x0)
f(x0, x1, s(x2))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ QTRS
↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ EdgeDeletionProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, y, s(z)) → F(0, 1, z)
F(0, 1, x) → F(s(x), x, x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(s(x), x, x)
f(x, y, s(z)) → s(f(0, 1, z))
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(0, 1, x0)
f(x0, x1, s(x2))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted some edges using various graph approximations
↳ QTRS
↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ EdgeDeletionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, y, s(z)) → F(0, 1, z)
F(0, 1, x) → F(s(x), x, x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(s(x), x, x)
f(x, y, s(z)) → s(f(0, 1, z))
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(0, 1, x0)
f(x0, x1, s(x2))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
F(x, y, s(z)) → F(0, 1, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
F(0, 1, x) → F(s(x), x, x)
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
F(x1, x2, x3) = F(x3)
s(x1) = s(x1)
0 = 0
1 = 1
Recursive Path Order [2].
Precedence:
0 > [F1, s1]
1 > [F1, s1]
The following usable rules [14] were oriented:
none
↳ QTRS
↳ Overlay + Local Confluence
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ EdgeDeletionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(0, 1, x) → F(s(x), x, x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(0, 1, x) → f(s(x), x, x)
f(x, y, s(z)) → s(f(0, 1, z))
The set Q consists of the following terms:
f(0, 1, x0)
f(x0, x1, s(x2))
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.